MELIOR LAWASSOCIATED LAW FIRM · ROME
CORPORATE · LITIGATION

Directors’ liability and judicial control of management

In the Italian S.r.l., Articles 2476 and 2409 provide different but potentially complementary responses to serious management irregularities, combining shareholder control, liability and judicial intervention.

Two remedies in the same crisis area

Management disputes may range from requests for information to liability claims and urgent judicial intervention. Articles 2476 and 2409 approach these issues from different functional perspectives.

Article 2476: information and liability

Non-managing shareholders have rights of information and inspection. Each shareholder may also bring a liability action against directors, and serious irregularities may support an application for interim removal within the statutory framework.

Interim removal

The purpose of interim removal is preventive: to stop serious irregular management from continuing while substantive liability is pursued. Urgency, gravity and evidentiary support are therefore central.

Article 2409 and judicial control

Article 2409 allows the court, where statutory conditions are met, to investigate serious management irregularities and adopt organisational measures that can extend beyond the relief available under Article 2476.

Alternative or complementary?

The better view is functional autonomy rather than strict subsidiarity. The choice depends on the objective pursued: compensation, urgent protection, investigation, remediation or a combination of these.

A strategy for the shareholder

Effective protection starts with evidence. Inspection rights, accounting information and management records help determine which remedy best protects the company, its assets and the shareholder’s position.

← BACK TO INSIGHTS